This index is the new standard companies can rely on because it is based on trusted government data and computed by algorithms refined over 40 years of assisting companies pursue and win government contracts.
Why is there a need for a Competitiveness Index for Federal Contractors?
The Competitiveness Index
Highlights and Findings
Figure 1 • Potential value of competitive awards by all US Government Agencies not including the General Services Administration from October 1, 2021, through July 31, 2023
Figure 2 • Number competitive awards by all US Government Agencies not including the General Services Administration from October 1, 2021, through July 31, 2023
Figure 3 • Average days from Initial Solictation Notice to Award by Federal Spending Category based on a representative sample of competitive awards from October 1, 2021, through July 31, 2023
Figure 4 • SMA Reference Portfolio of Federal Contractors
Figure 5 • Competitiveness ranking for companies listed in the 2023 Bloomberg Top 200 Companies (BGOV)
Figure 6 • Competitiveness ranking for companies listed in the 2023 Washington Technology Top 100
Figure 7 • Competitiveness ranking for companies listed in the 2023 Defense News Top 100
Figure 8 • Competitiveness rankings for SMA’s Portfolio competing for US Government contracts
Figure 9 • Competitiveness rankings for Broadly Diversified Primes in SMA’s Reference Portfolio competing for Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security contracts
Figure 10 • Competitiveness rankings for Broadly Diversified Primes in SMA’s Reference Portfolio competing for civilian agency contracts
Figure 11 • Competitiveness rankings for SMA’s Reference Portfolio competing for US Air Force contracts
Figure 12 • Competitiveness rankings for SMA’s Reference Portfolio competing for US Army contracts
Figure 13 • Competitiveness rankings for SMA’s Reference Portfolio competing for US Navy contracts
Figure 14 • Competitiveness rankings for Concentrated Plaforms and Systems Primes in SMA’s Reference Portfolio competing for Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security contracts
Figure 15 • Competitiveness rankings for Subsystems Primes in SMA’s Reference Portfolio competing for Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security contracts
Figure 16 • Competitiveness rankings for Management, Technical and other Professional Services Companies in SMA’s Portfolio competing for US Government contracts
Figure 17 • Competitiveness rankings for SMA’s Portfolio competing for Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security Aircraft, Ships/Submarines & Land Vehicles, Weapons & Ammunition and Sustainment contracts
Figure 18 • Competitiveness rankings for SMA’s Portfolio competing for Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security Professional Services and Information Technology contracts
Figure 19 • Competitiveness rankings for SMA’s Portfolio competing for Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security Electronic & Communication Equipment, Modification, Repair and related contracts
About us
